Showing posts with label auditions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label auditions. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Reverse Audition?

I get asked many times what makes me decide to try out for a specific show. What pulls me to it?
More often than not, I do so because I find a character to be interesting, and I think they would fit well with my style of acting. Almost as often, it is the play itself, and the story it is telling. I know many actors who would give one of these two answers to the same questions. Some go so far as to say that if you are not in love with the character, or at least the story arc, you should never try out for a production. I do not agree with this, however.
One must not hate a character one plays, that is true. You must not take on a role to which you can offer nothing. Misery and wasted time is sure to follow. But there are many other legitimate main reasons for trying out for any given show.
There is the director. Theatre is an actor’s medium, despite what some directors may insist. However, having to work with the wrong director for 6 to 8 weeks can make it a medium of tedium. Or worse. If you have worked well with a director before, enjoy his or her style, and feel totally at ease with them, and especially if you feel you are given the total freedom you need to explore your character with minimum interference, than audition for a show that director is staging. Even if it is a show you have not heard of, or do not care for as a whole, you may find that through a collaboration with someone you already admire, you will gain a new appreciation of the piece. I have more than once agreed to be part of a show simply because of the director involved, and have never regretted it. In more than one case I did in fact come away with a better opinion of the piece. Synergism and chemistry are a big part of community theatre.
On that same page, wanting to be in a show because of the rest of the cast also has its advantages. It is a bit more difficult to make such a decision, given that casting is usually unknown to everyone until all are informed by the director. There are occasions, though, when some parts are filled before others, and such actors become part of the audition process. Several people read with the already cast actor so the director can mark what sort of chemistry is present. If you already know you possess great on stage presence with someone who had earned a part, (or was pre-cast), by all means try out even for a mediocre show, or a show that doesn’t exactly knock you out. Like auditioning based on the director, the freedom you can find when you are already comfortable with cast mates at the start of a new production is very rewarding, and gives you a leg up.
Finally, I advocate trying out for shows that do not steal your heart when you have the chance to expose yourself to a new company, or theatre. Fair or unfair, companies and theatres tend to be at least somewhat clique oriented. Making yourself known, even in smaller roles, to the audiences and regulars of a theatre in which you have yet to perform is advantageous. So if your schedule allows, trying out for a show that does little for you otherwise, but could expose you to new people, will be of almost certain benefit down the road. (So long as you are fully dedicated if cast.)
Never do something you sense will make you miserable. If a production feels like it will annoy you, or you know you will get nothing out of it at all, by all means stay away. Just don’t adopt such tunnel vision that you feel only “perfect characters in perfect shows” should get you to go through the process of auditioning. If you do that, you decrease your stage time quite a bit.
(Originally appeared on showbizradio.net on September 2, 2009.)

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Richard III Auditions, Act II

Last night I went back to the Full Circle Theater in Shepherdstown, West Virginia for the second night of auditions for Richard III. I wasn't needed, but was told my presence would be appreciated the second night. So I went.

I didn't read for anything different than I did the previous night, however. I read mostly for Buckingham, while on occasion reading for Richard. It was mostly to fill in gaps for those who were auditioning and needed someone to read off of.

Though I didn't get the chance to read for any of Richard's monologues on either night, I am pleased with my readings both nights. I thought about requesting a chance to read specific speeches of minor characters that interested me which were not featured on the provided sides. Yet as the train was pulling out of the station near the end of the evening, I decided to just leave well enough alone. I figure the director had already seen anything they wanted anyway.

The second night was better attended somewhat than the first night. Several of my friends and cast mates from previous productions also auditioned last night. If I am to be in this play, there will certainly be plenty of familiar faces in the cast, I'd gather.

The director said she would try to inform everyone of their fates today sometime, or Monday at the latest. Today is not over yet of course, but I am thinking it is not likely I will get any word today. If I do, I will of course post a supplemental entry here. If not, check back here tomorrow to learn the results of my audition.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Auditions: My latest piece on ShowBizRadio

My most recent column over on showbizradio.net deal with choosing audition pieces.

In the majority of my experiences in smaller, local community theatre cold readings from the script of the show for which you are auditioning are the modus operendi. However on occasion I have had to perform a prepared piece of some kind. It can be nerve wracking at times, but not as nerve wracking as having to witness certain types of other actors deliver certain types of monologues. It can be cringe inducing, and it doesn't need to be this way.

Check out the piece to read my advice on what to choose, and what to avoid, when auditioning with a prepared monologue.